Landmark Judgements
|
Case No
|
Title
|
Brief Description
|
|---|---|---|
|
WP (C ) 4455/2010
|
Harishwar Dayal vs Union of India
|
Full Bench decision of the CAT (PB) was challenged. CAT (PB) had refused interference in private respondent's promotion. Hon'ble HIgh Court qualshed the promotion of the private respondent which was earned by him by judicial intervention upto Hon'ble Apex Court.
|
|
OA 802/2015 and other connected matters
|
Col Mukul Dev vs Union of India
|
Grant of Non Functional Upgradation to Armed Forces officers of all three services at par with Group 'A' civilian officers.
|
|
OA 116/2011 (AFT Lucknow)
|
Col Rajvir Singh vs Secretary Ministry of Defence
|
Interpretation of date of commencement of period of limitation under section 122 of Army Act.
|
|
OA 658/2008
|
Rajesh Jain vs Union of India
|
Cut off date for eligibility criteria was challenged in first round of litigation for appointment to the post of Judicial Member CESTAT and subsequent case was filed for correct computation of time and age of applicant.
|
|
CA 4/2014
(Full Bench at AFT Delhi)
|
Lt Col Mukul Dev vs Shri R. K. Mathur
|
Full Bench Constituted to decide whether provisions of Contempt of Court under section 19 of the AFT Act can be invoked to get the judgements/ orders implemented by the Tribunal And Whether the AFT is a Court of Record
|
|
CA 451/2015
|
Union of India vs Brig DN Singh
|
Promotion in Army. Whether the approving authority can change the recommendations of Selection Board without assigning any reasons
|
|
CA Dy 23984/2014
|
Col MM Mujumdar vs Union of India
|
Promotion policy in Army. Can the marks for same qualification for promotion be differentiated on the basis of methodology used for acquiring higher qualifications.
|
|
WP (C ) 5384/2017
|
Karan Nair vs Union of India
|
Defence Quota for admissions to Delhi University. Prioritisation of quota contested.
|
|
WP (C ) 8041/2015
|
Utkarsh vs Chairman and MD, Air Inida Ltd
|
Arbitrary reservation of vacancies (50%). For campus recruitment for commercial pilots only from IGRUA. Other flying institues left out for campus recruitment
|
|
OA 286/2017 and other connected matters
|
Maj Mukul Sharma vs Union of India
|
Discrimination meted to the applicants for non - consideration for allotment of PG Seats in AFMC Pune on the basis of NEET Examination, stating the applicants to be short service commission officers.
|
|
OA 3208/2011
|
SK Singh & Ors vs Chairman cum MD BSNL
|
Applicants sought pay parity and equal pay for equal work by way of stepping up of pay.
|
|
OA 1999/2009
|
AP Pathak vs Union of India
|
Appeared for private respondents whose selection in NHAI was challenged by applicant on the ground of insufficient experience in Highways and the private respondents' experience was upheld.
|
|
OA 2771/2008
|
Durga Prasad & Ors vs Secretary Minitsry of Health
|
Represented Union of India wherein the applicants working as Operation Theatre Assistants sought pay parity with their counterparts in Delhi Cantonment Board General Hospital.
|
|
OA 509/2017
|
Col JK Satpathy vs Union of India & Ors
|
Fixation of Pay and grant of Military service pay on absorption of Army officer to Civil Post
|
|
OA No 2042/2028
|
Ulhas Hiray & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors.
|
Pay Fixation with benefit of bunching to the applicants as per illustration 4A of Rule 7 (1) of CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, which is equal to 3% of the Pay Band + corresponding Grade pay and refix the pay of the applicants w.e.f. 01.01.2006
|
|
OA 1413/2022
|
Lt Col Sandeep Kumar
|
Promotion to the rank of Col on the basis of disputed value judgement marks by Selection Board and the Tribunal granted the promotion
|
|
OA 367/2022
|
Col Sameer Balodi Vs. Union of India
|
Challenging the conduct of second Court of Inquiry on the same facts and grounds which were already investigated and applicant suitably reprimanded
|
|
TA 313/2010
(AFT Lucknow)
|
Union of India vs State of MP (Private respondent Maj RS Dudee)
|
Plea of private respondent regarding remission by Governor for convicts under Army Act is dispute between Centre and State and thus Original jurisdiction lies with Hon'ble Supreme Court under Article 131 of Constitution.
|
|
OA 286/2017 and other connected matters
|
Maj Mukul Sharma vs Union of India
|
Discrimination meted to the applicants for non - consideration for allotment of PG Seats in AFMC Pune on the basis of NEET Examination, stating the applicants to be short service commission officers.
|
|
OA 462/2015
|
Sep Rohith vs Union of India
|
Challenged award of punishment of dismissal and three months RI by Court Martial. Challenging GCM on the basis of Supreme Court judgement declaring section 66 of IT Act as unconstitutional. Interpretation of date of effectiveness of unconstitutionality.
|
|
OA 386/2012
|
Brig PK Tikoo vs Union of India
|
GCM cannot be held in the absence of sufficient evidence collected in Summary of Evidence, and non - application of mind of competent authority under Rule 37 of Army Rules while ordering GCM.
|
|
TA 551/2009
|
Maj Shalu Singh vs Union of India
|
Pre-mature release from Army Medical Corps since married to person settling in foreign country.
|
|
CA 4/2014
(Full Bench at AFT Delhi)
|
Lt Col Mukul Dev vs Shri R. K. Mathur
|
Full Bench Constituted to decide whether provisions of Contempt of Court under section 19 of the AFT Act can be invoked to get the judgements/ orders implemented by the Tribunal And Whether the AFT is a Court of Record
|
|
OA 189/2009
|
Smt Sunita Devi vs Union of India
|
Family pension when the husband of the applicant was treated as deserter when he only absented himself without leave. AFT held him to have died in harness and family pension granted.
|
|
TA 431/2009
|
Nb Risaldar Jai Karan Singh vs Union of India
|
Punishment of Life Imprisonment by Summary General Court Martial.
|
|
OA 67/2015
|
Maj Gen Sukesh Rakshit vs Union of India
|
Non - promotion to the rank of Lt Gen and challenging certain ACRs wherein the impugned ACRs were quashed and directed to re-consider by review board.
|
|
OA 39 (J)/ 2017
|
Maj Gen Deepinder Singh vs Union of India
|
Applicant challenged demotion to the rank of Brig on the basis of policy not issued by competent authority. Promotion restored.
|
|
OA 118/2017
|
Col Avinash Puri vs Union of India
|
Increase in age of retirement for Army officers (Col) from 54 to 56 years.
|
|
OA 1387/2018
|
Col DP Singh vs Union of India
|
Release from Army on selection of applicant in civil organisation applied through proper channel.
|
|
OA 657/2018
|
Brig Rajwant Singh vs Union of India
|
Promotion to the rank of Maj Gen when the policy has been changed after the selection procedure commenced and the vacancies reduced to 3/4.
|
